Comparison

Where we win, and where we lose

A comparison worth reading is one that admits what it lacks. Here is the full matrix, and then every place a competitor is genuinely ahead of us today.

Feature matrix

"Yes" means shipped and covered by tests. An em dash means we do not have it. Partial is called partial. Competitor columns come from each project's own public documentation, read in July 2026.

Capability Spooktacular Tart Anka Orka
Licensing
Licence MITevery feature, no tiers Fair Source Commercialpaid tiers Commercialhosted by MacStadium
Full source available Yes Yes
Runs on hardware you own Yes Yes Yes MacStadium only
Creating and cloning
Shared base image with per-VM overlay Yesone macOS install per build an image per VM Yes Yes
APFS copy-on-write cloning Yes30 ms for a 5 GB VM, 0 extra bytes Yes Yes Yes
Disk snapshots Yessave, restore, list, delete Yes Yes
Suspend and resume to disk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Ephemeral VMs Yes--ephemeral Manual cleanup Yes Yes
Licence-capacity enforcement Yestwo macOS guests per host
Provisioning
Native guest provisioning YesVZMacGuestProvisioningOptions, macOS 27
Provisioning without guest networking YesLaunchDaemon written into the base SSH only Needs an agent Needs an agent
Definitive readiness signal Yesthe guest reports its exit code over vsock Poll for SSH Its agent reports Its agent reports
Anything to install inside the guest Nothing Nothing An agent An agent
CI runner templates PartialGitHub Actions only PartialGitHub Actions Several Several
Networking
Per-VM subnet with a reserved address Yesspook ip is a lookup, not a probe Shared NAT Yes Yes
Publish a guest port on the host Yes--publish 8080:80 Yes Yes
Bridged networking Yeswith a NAT fallback Yes Yes Yes
Fully isolated networking Yes Yes Yes
Guest experience
Metal-accelerated displays Yesup to two per VM Yes Yes Headless
Audio output and microphone Yes Yes
Shared folders YesVirtIO directory sharing Yes Yes Yes
Clipboard sync PartialSPICE clipboard only Yes Yes
Linux guests Yescloud image plus cloud-init Yes
Interfaces
Native Mac app YesSwiftUI, on the CLI's own core Yes Web UI
Command-line interface Yes27 subcommands Yes Yes Yes
HTTP API Yeswith signed requests Yes Yes
Accessibility YesVoiceOver throughout the app Not applicableno GUI Unstated Unstated
Fleet and security
Runner pool orchestration Yesa ten-state lifecycle machine Yes Yes
Mutual TLS, control plane to node Yesoptional, mutual certificate auth Server TLS only Yes
Certificate rotation without a restart Yesfile-watch hot reload Unstated
Role-based access control Yesplus Secure-Enclave-bound keys Yes Yes
Fleet autoscaling not implemented Partialmanual pools Yes
OCI registry push and pull planned Yes Yes Yes
Supply-chain attestations YesSBOM and artifact attestations Unstated Unstated
Publicly visible test suite 865 tests222 suites, run on every change Yes Not public Not public
Commercial support contract community only Yes Yes Yes

Where the competition is ahead

These are real gaps, not hedges. If one of them sits on your critical path, another tool is the better choice today.

Tart, Anka, Orka

OCI registries

Tart pushes and pulls VM images from any OCI-compliant registry today. We do not. If your workflow distributes images through a registry, that is a requirement we cannot meet yet.

Orka

Fleet autoscaling

Orka scales a pool against demand, and Anka offers manual pool management. We orchestrate runners on a single host and have no multi-host fleet management at all.

Anka, Orka

CI systems beyond GitHub Actions

Both ship native integrations for BuildKite, CircleCI and Jenkins. We have a GitHub Actions template and nothing else, so any other CI system means writing your own first-boot script.

Tart, Anka, Orka

Someone to call

They sell support with response commitments. We are community-supported through GitHub issues. If you need a vendor contractually on the hook, that is a real difference.

Anka, Orka

Deeper host-to-guest integration

Their guest agents do more than our SPICE clipboard bridge. We chose not to require an agent inside the guest, and thinner integration is the price of that choice.

Orka

Kubernetes-native operation

Orka runs as Kubernetes-native managed infrastructure. If you want Macs to behave like any other node pool, that is a different kind of product from this one.

What it costs

Spooktacular is MIT licensed with every feature included: not a free tier with the useful parts held back.

$0 licence cost, for every feature
0 licence keys, seats or activation servers
0 sales calls needed to evaluate it
MIT so you may fork it and ship it commercially
About the cost table that used to be here This page previously carried a three-year total-cost comparison built on specific competitor licence figures and an assumed EC2 hourly rate. Those numbers were neither sourced nor dated, and vendor pricing moves, so presenting them as fact was not defensible. The honest version is shorter: our licence cost is zero, and the hardware bill is the same whichever tool runs on it. So compare each vendor's current published price against nothing.

Read the code before you believe the table.

Every capability claimed above lives in a public repository with its tests beside it. That is the only comparison claim that verifies itself.